Raison et liberte
Common sense for urbanites. I am a MBA student, libertarian, lover of design, branding and beautiful things + people. Have fun while you browse and go check my other blogs, Le Business C'est Super Chic and Emerging Markets.
If feminism is for equality, why do feminists discount evidence of male oppression because “only women are oppressed,” then conclude that only women are oppressed, because there is no evidence to the contrary?

iffeminismisforequality:

sexxxisbeautiful:

because some men are oppressed but never for being men.

some men are oppressed for being a person of color, for being trans*, for being poor, for being queer.

but never for being a man.

So what do you say to the large amount of evidence demonstrating systemic legal discrimination against men in the courtshealth care spendingreproductive rightsgovernment issue representationsupport for male victims of domestic violence and rape…?

    1. 147 notesTimestamp: Thursday 2012/02/23 17:53:24Via: dagestaniprincess-deactivated20Source: iffeminismisforequality
    1. permutationofninjas reblogged this from permutationofninjasarchive and added:
      Aaaaaaaand….nope. First, you presume that the only people sexist against men are women. This comes from feminists’...
    2. finallyhopingtobecomehappy reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    3. soulofapoet reblogged this from lloudmouth
    4. breachbangbloom reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    5. permutationofninjasarchive reblogged this from viraginous
    6. fuzzyhorns reblogged this from viraginous and added:
      what? what was your point with all that sassiness? i meant that sexism “only works one way” in the sense that it only...
    7. egalitarianscum reblogged this from iffeminismisforequality
    8. moosieq reblogged this from littlecat and added:
      I’m glad to see some form of sense about these things although prejudice is defined as: a preconceived opinion not based...
    9. littlecat reblogged this from fuzzyhorns
    10. ofthetrees reblogged this from queerio19
    11. viraginous reblogged this from fuzzyhorns and added:
      No, I’m sorry. I love your blog and all, and I follow you on my main blog but you’re wrong here. Words mean things,...
    12. ladelcabaret reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    13. embryonic-journey reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    14. legalizeforeskin reblogged this from permutationofninjasarchive and added:
      Bolding the parts that really resonate with my perception of things. I also feel like power structures can be pretty...
    15. lokh reblogged this from misterscarlet
    16. elizabeth-hornswoggle reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    17. kitcloudkickr reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    18. mostshockingtwistyet reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    19. oldwoodsman reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful and added:
      word
    20. deutschesrequiem reblogged this from lalibertarienne and added:
      inb4 those don’t count because only women are oppressed so therefore only women are oppressed.
    21. purgatori reblogged this from sexxxisbeautiful
    22. oldthrashbarg reblogged this from swagdaddy43 and added:
      I find this argument to be completely invalid. What about alimony, or mandatory circumcision, or accusations of sexual...
    23. nellieblystunad reblogged this from iffeminismisforequality
    24. swagdaddy43 reblogged this from humanbeann and added:
      because some men are oppressed but never for being men....some men are oppressed for being...
    25. lechetherat reblogged this from melonella
    26. iffeminismisforequality posted this